Tag Archives: Roi Ben-Yehuda

The Article Has International Legs

Here are some additional places that have re-published my Iran/Israel piece (co-written with Dr. Trita Parsi). The piece was originally published in Haaretz.

Turkish Daily News: The Turkish Daily News, established in March 1961, is Turkey’s first and largest English-language daily, joining the DYH family in January 2000.

Middle East Times: A daily newspaper, owned by News World Communications, a corporation owned and operated by the Unification church, published in Cairo, Egypt. Its print content is tightly controlled by the Egyptian Ministry of Information, though it does publish stories censored by the ministry on its website.

Common Ground News (in Hebrew) (in Arabic) (in French) (in Urdu) (Bahasa Indonesia) The Common Ground News Service (CGNews) seeks to promote mutual understanding and offer hope, opportunities for dialogue and constructive suggestions that facilitate peaceful resolution of conflict. We publish and promote articles by local and international experts on current Middle East issues and the relationship between the West and Arab and Muslim communities.

Meditation On An Israeli Flag

My new piece in Haaretz, a continuation of my Barcelona series, explores why I find the Israeli flag at once so attractive and repulsive. Here is an excerpt:

I have always been suspicious and even afraid of flags. Perhaps it has something to do with growing up in more than one country, but all too often flags have seemed to me to be tied to the worst aspects of tribalism and mob mentality. I had even once declared to my girlfriend that I would never date a girl who owns a flag, any flag. She replied with raised eyebrows that she in fact owns one, whereby I quickly changed the topic of conversation.

To read more, please click here:

Iranian.com Re-publishes Our Iran/Israel Piece

Iranian.com has re-published my article with Dr. Trita Parsi. The comments on the page are also worth a read.

Newsday Gives Us Some Love

Newsday gives the Iran/Israel piece I co-wrote with Dr.Trita Parsi some love.

It’s tough these days to hear anything calm and rational about Iran.

There are still rumors about a desire deep within the Bush administration to launch a military attack on Iran before a new American president takes office.

A recent Seymour Hersh piece in The New Yorker reports on a presidential decision to allow more covert military operations within Iran.

Congress is moving toward a concurrent resolution, spearheaded in the House by Rep. Gary Ackerman (D-Jamaica Estates), urging President George W. Bush to put increasing pressure on Iran. Critics of that resolution say that, although it doesn’t mention the word blockade, the actions it asks Bush to initiate would amount to a blockade.

Israel held a military exercise that seemed designed to show it could mount an attack on Iran. And an Iranian missile test has been widely construed as their way of saying: “Don’t tread on us.”

Into that highly charged atmosphere comes a calm, sensible, intelligent analysis, “Essential things Israelis and Iranians should know about each other,” in the Israeli newspaper Haaretz.

The two authors are Trita Parsi, an Iranian with expertise in Iran-Israel relations, and Roi Ben-Yehuda, an American-Israeli writer. It’s worth reading to get a perspective of the fears and the history of the two nations most central to the dangerous dispute over a potential Iranian nuclear weapon.

Iran & Israel: Let’s Give Them Something To Talk About

The looming Iran-Israel confrontation has a seemingly deterministic quality to it. The hard-line politicians on both sides are beating the drums of war – hypnotizing, mobilizing, and gyrating the masses to a dance of death. Yet a great deal of this conflict is fueled by ignorance of one another – what each others’ societies, culture, and people are really like. The hard-liners feed off this ignorance.

To that end, over at Haaretz Dr.Trita Parsi and I co-wrote a piece on some essential things Israelis and Iranians need to know about one another.

* The article is dedicated to the loving memory of Amir Jahanbani – the best teacher I have ever known.

A Proud Nation: Gay Pride Parade In Jerusalem

In honor of the Gay Pride Parade that recently took place in Jerusalem, I am reposting one of my first published articles. The article, entitled A Proud Nation, appeared in Tikkun on November 9th, 2006. I actually really like this article, it is still one of my favorite pieces. Enjoy.

A Proud Nation
By Roi Ben-Yehuda

Make no mistake about it, the Gay Pride parade that is scheduled to take place this Friday in Jerusalem is nothing short of a litmus test for Israel as a democracy. Can you imagine a gay pride parade taking place in Mecca, Tehran, Kabul, or Baghdad? You can’t. And the reason you can’t is because these places lack basic freedoms. But Israel is different. Israel takes pride in being the only democracy in the Middle East, a title that will ring hollow lest the government protects the right of its minority citizens to free speech and public demonstration.

The arguments against the parade have ranged from the sophisticated, to the absurd, to the immoral. Some have argued that since the parade will undoudbtly incite violence, the right to life should take precedent over the right to free speech. Others have said that in the name of tolerance and respect, that the parade should be cancelled or rerouted to Tel-Aviv. Still others have called out that Jerusalem is a sacred city, and the presence of gays will desecrate its holy grounds.

Fortunately, all these arguments, in one guise or another, have been rebutted. The potential of danger, cannot eliminate people’s right to free speech and demonstration. If that would be the case, then every group that would feel offended would resort to the threat of violence or violent behavior to get rid of the source of their indignation.

Likewise, the idea that in the name of tolerance and respect the parade should be rerouted is equally unacceptable. The French-Arab intellectual Amin Maalouf responded to this type of reasoning best when he wrote that, “Traditions deserve to be respected only insofar as they are respectable – that is, exactly insofar as they themselves respect the fundamental rights of men and women.”

Finally, the notion that the mere presence of gays and those who support them will foul the hallowed grounds of Jerusalem, rest on accepting a particular religious moral construct as normative. Jerusalem, the city, as sacred space is not a legal concept, and the idea that gays are an abomination has no place in the moral discourse of those who have respect for human dignity. In short, none of these arguments are sufficient for putting a halt to the demonstration.

Lost in these debates is an unquestioned assumption that needs to be addressed: namely, that homosexuality is an affront to Judaism. Many orthodox Jews do indeed consider homosexuality to be an abomination. In the Torah, it states that “if a man copulates with another male as one copulates with a woman, both of them have acted abominably; they shall be put to death… [Leviticus 20:13]

Yet in the heat of the moment, what people often overlook is that the word abomination appears all over the Bible (122 times in all). It is used for eating non-Kosher animals [Deus 14:3], to describe the act of man who remarries his wife after she married another [24:4], to describe bringing improper sacrifice to God [Deut 17:1], to describe acting with envy, and to describe shedding innocent blood [Proverbs 3:32, 16:22]. Given that all these are considered abominations, why are the religiously orthodox able to live with some and not with others? Are not all abomination created equal?

Whats more, is homosexuality really prohibited by the Torah? As mentioned above, the prohibition against homosexuality comes from an interpretation of two Leviticus passages which state that males should not lie with other males as if they were females. But the text itself is not so clear cut, and is subject to multiple interpretations. First off, we should note that the prohibition is directed at males only. The Torah says nothing about female to female relations. Next, we need to ask what does it mean to for a man to lie with another man “as one lies with a woman”? [Leviticus 18:22]

Rabbi Simcha Roth, an authority on Jewish law, has written that the major prohibition intimated by Leviticus is that of anal sex and not homosexuality. In other words, what the Torah disallows is for a man to treat another man as he would a woman – i.e. penetrate him. In his essay “Dear David: Homosexual relationships – A Halachic Investigation”, Roth writes that, “If the Torah is prohibiting the specific act of anal penetration of one male by another; it follows that the two verses of the Torah are not a blanket prohibition of homosexuality.”

Going beyond this less-exclusive interpretation, the American Orthodox Rabbi Shmuley Boteach summed up the matter beautifully when he wrote that , “Religious people should finally get over their all-too-apparent homophobia and reverse the discriminatory policy which says that homosexuality is an aberration marked by God for special censure. Like heterosexual men and women, gays are God’s children, capable of bringing light and love to a planet whose darkness is caused not only by sin but also misguided judgmentalism.” Amen to that.

It must be remembered that as much as Judaism is the religion that gave us Leviticus 18:22, it is also the relgion that gave us the divine commandment “You should love the stranger, for you were once strangers in the land of Egypts.” [Deut 10:19] And who is today’s strangers, if not our gay, lesbian, and transsexual brothers and sisters.

Religion should unite us, engendering a spirit of compassion and loving-kindness in all. If it fails to do so, its usefulness will become obsolete. The great irony of the gay pride parade in Jerusalem is that it manages, in the name of bigotry, to unite orthodox Jews, Muslims, and Christians. Israelis and Jews across the world would be wise to ask themselves if these are the type of bed fellows that they really want.

I began this article by stating that if Israel wants to march in the Democracy Pride Parade, then it must act in congruence with its democratic principles. Likewise, if the Jewish people want to live up to the biblical injunction to be a “light unto the nations”, they must reject the hatred and bigotry espoused in their name and take pride in their mighty spiritual and universal heritage.

France 24: Israeli Shark Tale

The Israeli Consulate in New York recently released a video of 11-year-old American children reading a book written by Gilad Shalit – The Israeli solider held captive by Hamas in Gaza. The short story, composed by Shalit when he was 11, and entitled, “When the Shark and the Fish First Met”, tells a tale of a shark and fish who despite their parent’s instruction befriend one another. At the end of the story their friendship leads to peace between the two species.

The video shows an ethnically and racially diverse group of 5th graders reading the story bestrewed with uplifting illustrations while accompanied by melancholic music. According to David Saranga, Consul for Media and Public Affairs, one of the people who helped organize the Video project, the purpose of the video is to “raise awareness of this humanitarian issue in the United States and around the world. A multiethnic selection of students reading this story of peace and reconciliation sends a powerful message that cannot be ignored.”

My comments, published in France 24’s The Observers:

I find both the story and the video to be really interesting. The story conveys a type of innocence, optimism, imagination, sweetness, and child-like naiveté that is beautiful.

I think that naturally, given what happened to the author 8 years after writing this story, we all assume that Shalit/Israelis are represented in the story by the fish and the Palestinians by the shark. And yet, what is interesting is that if you would read this story to a group of Palestinian children, they would identify themselves with the fish and the Israelis with the shark. In a way, this is one of the main problems in the Arab-Israeli conflict, both people see themselves as helpless fish fighting against ruthless sharks.

I also found interesting that there is a religious messianic element to the tale – in the Jewish tradition it is said that when the messiah will arrive the world will be radically transformed to the degree that swords will be turned into ploughshares, and the wolves shall dwell with the lamb. In this story, instead of the wolf dwelling with the lamb, we have the shark playing with the fish.

Yet such utopianism is what makes this tale so very painful: Reading this story with grown-up eyes, we know that fish and shark will never be friends. At the end of the story with its happy ending, realism kicks in. We see a picture of Shalit with a caption that says: “Two Years have passed and Gilad Shalit is still held in captivity”. It seems that the shark, whom ever he may be, has in the end eaten the fish.

Finally, what I found peculiar and somewhat distasteful about the video is the fact that it is made for Americans. Why are the kids American and not Israelis and Palestinians? It seems to me that this is a video that should have Israeli and Palestinian kids in it. They should be the ones reading the story. They should be the ones watching this video. Why is this the business of the Israeli consulate in NY? Is the Shalit story really lacking in awareness?

It obvious that this has to do with image as with anything else. Israel is trying hard to win minds and heart of the American public. If they only put this type of creative energy into coexistence at home, maybe the shark will eventually play with the fish.

The french version is here.

Jewcy Thoughts: Tzipi Livni And Kevin Garnett Can Solve The Arab-Israeli Conflict

After he became a champion, an emotional Kevin Garnett said that all is possible. Well, how about solving the Arab-Israeli conflict? Here is my Jewcy article on the why Tzipi Livni and Kevin Garnett give me hope the Arab-ISraeli conflict can be solved:

Here is an excerpt:

The historian J. Rufus Fears noted that great leaders – from Pericles to Lincoln to Churchill – share four characteristics. They are anchored in principles, guided by a moral compass, posses a vision, and have the ability to build consensus to achieve their vision. These are the qualities that differentiate them as statesmen as opposed to mere politicians.

Unfortunately, the current leadership in Israel is the epitome of mere politicians. Prime-Minister Olmert, for example, is a drunken captain at the helm of a ship headed for an iceberg. An uninspiring power-hungry man mired in corruption and lacking vision, he is leading his country into disaster.

The truth is that people matter. For good or ill, individuals can change the course of history. Recently, the United States has seen what remarkable change the right person can achieve. A tall African-American man did what most thought impossible. No, I am not talking about Barack Obama, but Boston Celtics forward Kevin Garnett.

To read more, click here. As always, if the spirit moves you, please leave a comment at the end of the article.

Jewcy Picks Up My Haaretz Neo-Nazi Bookstore Piece

Over at Jewcy, Daniel Koffler writes:

“Jewcer Roi Ben-Yehuda wrote up his recent trip to Barcelona for Haaretz. If you want to see antisemitism done right — or if you want to restore your confidence in the importance of Zionism — go to Europe and then wait around a while:

If the presence of swastikas were not enough, Barcelona also has the dubious honor of being home to Europe’s most infamous neo-Nazi bookstore, brazenly titled “Europa Bookstore: Persecuted Books – The Truth Will Set You Free.”…

The books in the store were a literary mix covering revisionism, fascism, Israel-bashing, Hitler-praising, anti-immigration and homophobia. To this was added DVDs and CDs of Hitler’s “greatest hits.”

In my best Spanglish, I told a young woman who asked if I needed help that I would like to take some pictures and talk to her. She hesitated and then declined, but told me that I could “come back tomorrow and speak to the leader.”…

[A]s I walked around I had a “for the six million!” moment. One of those moments that lead Jews to do something about injustice. So I took out my camera and started taking pictures…

“Give me your camera,” she had raised her voice. “I want to see the pictures. I want to eliminate the pictures!”

“Leader”; “eliminate.” The great thing about European fascists and racists is that they traditionally haven’t put up much of a pretense of not being fascists and racists. Sadly, though, the new crop of the European far-right seems to be taking trans-Atlantic PR cues. Even the most deranged neo-Nazis on these shores feel compelled to wrap their hatred up in some public interest cause — like saving the wombs of white women from the Pornocaust. So it’s comforting, in its way, to learn that there’s a little corner of Catalonia where the good stuff, the real unadulterated neo-Nazism is served straight up, no chaser.”

New Republic Picks Up On My Haaretz Neo-Nazi Bookstore Piece

From The New Republic:

I’ve loved Spain for decades, and Catalonia, especially. I first went there when Franco was still in power and the favored slogan on public buildings was “todo por la patria.” We came back many times, and the last time was for my son’s wedding. In the 45 years since our first visit, Barcelona had become one of the most happening cities in the world, maybe behind London and ahead of Tel Aviv, but way, way up there. Visually gorgeous, demographically mixed, temperamentally intense…And now, you could talk politics — if that is what you wanted to talk about- without casting your eye over your shoulder to see if you were being watched.

So an Ha’aretz article about a Nazi bookstore in Barcelona this morning surprised me. I suppose phenomena such as this are the wages of freedom.